Comparison of Logistic Regression and Geomod Approaches to Forest Change Modeling in the Period of 1988 – 2025

Main Article Content

Somayeh Galdavi
Marjan Mohammadzadeh
Abdolrassoul Salman Mahiny
Ali Najafi Nejad

Abstract

Spatial modelling of land use change is a technique for understanding changes in terms of the location and amount. In this study, logistic regression and Geomod approaches were used for modelling forest change in Gorgan area in Northern Iran in the time period of 1988-2007. To do this, at first, remotely sensed imagery data of the years 1988, 1998 and 2007 were used to produce land use maps. Land use maps accuracy assessments were achieved using Error matrix method and then the maps were used to implement change detection process in two time periods of 1988-1998 and 1998-2007. Results indicated a reduction in forest areas during the mentioned time period. Next, the independent variables were extracted in order to land use change modeling. The Results of the models implementation showed the ability of both models for forest change modeling in this region. Also, the models were used to predict the future condition of forest area in the years 2016 and 2025. The results revealed that the forest area would be associated with a reduction in the future. Comparison of the results of the models using kappa indices showed the successful implementation of both models for forest change modelling in this region. The results of this research reveal the need for appropriate applications of the proper plans to control land use change in order to preserve the environment and ecological balance of the area. Therefore, careful planning can reduce the land use change and its impacts in the future in this region.

Keywords:
Land use change modeling, logistic regression, geomod approach, Gorgan area, Iran

Article Details

How to Cite
Galdavi, S., Mohammadzadeh, M., Mahiny, A. S., & Nejad, A. N. (2019). Comparison of Logistic Regression and Geomod Approaches to Forest Change Modeling in the Period of 1988 – 2025. Asian Journal of Research in Agriculture and Forestry, 4(4), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajraf/2019/v4i430066
Section
Original Research Article

References

Huang QH, Cai YL, Peng J. Modeling the spatial pattern of farmland using GIS and multiple logistic regression: A case study of Maotiao River Basin, Guizhou province, China. Environ Model Assess. 2007;12: 55-61.

Ahadnejad M, Maruyama Y, Yamazaki F. Evaluation and forecast of human impact based on land use change using multi-temporal satellite imagery and GIS: A case study on Zanjan, Iran. Indian Soc. Remote sens. 2009;37:561-571.

Schneider LC, Pontius Jr. RG. Modeling land-use change in the Ipswich watershed, Massachusetts, USA. Agriculture Eco-systems & Environment. 2001;85:83-94.

Lin YP, Hong NM, Wu CF, Verburg PH. Impacts of land use change scenarios on hydrology and land use patterns in the Wu-Tu watershed in northern Taiwan. Landscape and Urbane Planning. 2007;80: 111-126.

McDonald RI, Urban D. Spatially varying rules of landscape change: Lessons from a case study. Landscape and Urban Planning. 2006;74:7-20.

Panigrahy RK, Kale MP, Dutta U, Mishra A, Banerjee B, Singh S. Forest cover change detection of Western Ghats of Maharashtra Using satellite remote sensing based visual interpretation technique. Current Science. 2010;98:657-658.

Verburg PH, Soepboer W, Veldkamp A, Espaldon V, Limpiadi R, Mastura SHSA. Modeling the spatial dynamics of regional land use: the clue-s model. Environmental management. 2002;30(3):391-405.

Pontius Jr. RG, Agrawal A, Huffaker D. Estimating the uncertainty of land cover extrapolations while constructing a raster map from tabular data. Journal of Geographical System. 2003;5:235-237.

Zhu Z, Liu L, Chen Z, Zhang J, Verburg PH. Land-use change simulation and assessment of driving factors in the loess hilly region-A case study as Pengyang County. Environ Monit Assess. 2009;10.

Serneels S, Lambian EF. Proximate causes of land-use change in Narok district, Kenya: A spatial statistical model. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment. 2001;85:65-81.

Pontius Jr. RG, Boersma W, Castella J. Ch, Clarke K, Nijs TD, Dietzel Ch, Duan Z, Fotsing E, Goldstein N, Kok K, Koomen E, Lippitt Ch, McConnell W, Sood AM, Pijanowski B, Pithadia S, Sweeney S, Trung TN, Veldkamp AT, Verburg PH. Comparing the input, output and validation maps for several models of land change. Springer. 2008;41:11-37.

Schneider LC, Pontius Jr. RG. Modeling land-use change in the Ipswich watershed, Massachusetts, USA. Agriculture Eco-systems & Environment. 2001;85:83-94.

Mahiny A, Turner BJ. Modeling past vegetation change through remote sensing and G.I.S: A comparison of neural networks and logistic regression methods. School of Resources, Environment and Society, the Australian National University, Canberra 0200, Australia; 2003.

Zeng YN, Wu GP, Zhan FB, Zhang HH. Modeling spatial land use pattern using autologistic regression. The international archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote sensing and Spatial Information Science. XXX VII. Part B 2. Beijing. 2008;115-119.

Pontius Jr. RG, Schneider LC. Land-cover change model validation by an ROC method for the Ipswich watershed, Massachusetts, USA. Agriculture Eco-systems and Environment. 2001;65:239-284.

Peterson LK, Bergen KM, Brown DG, Vashchuk L, Blam Y. Forested land–cover patterns and trends over changing forest management eras in the Siberian Baikal region. Forest Ecology and Management. 2009;257:911-922.

Cabral P, Zamyatin A. Three land change models for urban dynamics analysis in Sintra-Cascais area. 1st Earsel workshop of the sig urban Remote Sensing Humboldt-universitst Zu Berlin; 2006.

Tyrrell ML, Hall MHP, Sampson RN. Global institute of sustainable forestry, program on private forests. Yale University. School of Forestry & Environmental Studies; 2004.

Dushku A, Brown S. Spatial modeling of baselines for LULUCF Carbon Projects: The GEOMOD modeling approach. International conference on tropical forests and climate change: “Carbon sequestration and the clean development mechanism”. Manila; 2003

Pontius Jr. RG. Statistical methods to partition effects of quantity and location during comparison of categorical maps at multiple resolutions. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing. 2002; 68(10):1041-1049.

Brown S. Finalizing avoided deforestation project Baselines. Winrock International. Contract No. 523-C00- 02-00032-00; 2003.

Brown S, Hall M, Andrasko K, Ruiz F, Marzoli W, Guerrero G, Masera O, Dushku A, DeJong B. Baselines for land-use change in the tropics: Application to avoided deforestation projects. Mitig Adapt Start Glob Chenge. 2007;12:1001-1026.

Pontius Jr. RG, Spencer J. Uncertainty in extrapolations of predictive land-change models. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design. 2005;32:211-230.

Giriraj A, Irfan-Ullah M, Ramachandra Murthy MS, Beierkuhnlein C. Modelling spatial and temporal forest cover change Patterns (1973-2020): A Case Study from South Western Ghats (India). Sensors. No 8. 2008;6132-6153.

Pontius Jr. RG, Cornell JD, Hall CAS. Modeling the spatial pattern of land- use change with GEOMOD2: Application and validation for CostaRica. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment. 2001;1775:1-13.

Pontius Jr. RG, Pacheco P. Calibration and validation of model of forest disturbance in the western Ghats, India 1920- 1990. Geo Journal. 2004;61:325-334.

Echeverria C, Coomes DA, Hall M, Newton AC. Spatially explicit models to analyze forest loss and fragmentation between 1976 and 2020 in southern Chile. Ecological Modeling. 2008;212:439-449.

Gobin A, Campling P, Feyen J. Logistic modeling to derive agricultural land use determininants: A case study from southeastern Nigeria. Agriculture Eco-systems and Environment. 2002;89:213-228.

Vliet JV. Assessing the accuracy of changes in spatial explicit land use change models. 12th A Gil international conference on geographic information science. Leibniz University Honnover, Germany; 2009.

Williams NSG, McDonnell MJ, Seager EJ. Factors influencing the loss of an endangered ecosystem in an urbanizing landscape: A case study of native grasslands from Melbourne, Australia. Landscape and Urban Planning. 2005;71: 35-49.

Ellis EA, Porter-Bolland L. Is community-based forest management more effective than protected areas? A comparison of land use/land cover change in two neighboring study areas of the central Yuncatan peninsula, M J exico. Forest ecology and management. 2008;256:1971-1983.