Allometric Aboveground Biomass Models for Northern Delhi Ridge Forest
Issue: 2023 - Volume 9 [Issue 4]
Mayank Tripathi *
Ecophysiology Laboratory, Department of Functional Plant Biology, SSJ University, Almora, Uttarakhand, India.
Ecophysiology Laboratory, Department of Functional Plant Biology, SSJ University, Almora, Uttarakhand, India.
*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Bio energy obtained through forest biomass is a promising renewable energy option that provides a more environmentally sustainable alternative to fossil resources by reducing the net flux of greenhouse gases to the atmosphere. India, a developing nation is also in the process of building forest biomass models to study the potential of forests in short and long - term carbon mitigation. Earlier, traditional and destructive sampling were the popular methods for the aforesaid purpose. Recently, non - destructive methods have been adopted applying different allometric equations mostly developed outside India. Thus, there was a need to develop non- destructive allometric aboveground (AGB) models complementing the Indian climate. Also, there was a scarcity of domestic/local AGB models for arid, semi- arid, northern tropical thorn forest of India. The objectives of this study were to develop site-specific and mixed- species allometric models to predict AGB, at the Northern Delhi Ridge Forest (NDRF) using nonlinear mathematical functions. The model has a wide scope and can be applied to adjoining areas as well having similar climatic conditions. Three allometric combinations were tried to fit the aboveground biomass data obtained from the ridge forest. A three- parametric Richard’s model (with predictor variable x=D2H) was best fitted to AGB (R2adj= 0.9463) values for larger trees. Meanwhile, for juvenile plants, a three- parametric Richard function was best fitted (R2adj= 0.9733) when (x = DH) was used as a predictor variable. Cross- validation of model parameters exhibited statistical stability.
Keywords: Forest biomass, renewable energy, greenhouse gases, allometric, aboveground biomass, non-destructive, nonlinear, Northern Delhi Ridge Forest
How to Cite
Dube T, Gara TW, Mutanga O, Sibanda M, Ndaimain H, Hatendi CM. Estimating - forest standing biomass in Savannah woodlands as an indicator of forest productivity using the new generation World view-2 sensor. Geo carto Int. 2018;33(2):178-188.
Worbes M, Raschka N. Carbon allocation in a Costa Rican dry forest derived from tree ring analysis. Dendrochronologia. 2012; 30 (3): 231- 238.
Ngugi MR, Neldner VJ, Ryan S, Lewis T, Li J, Norman P, Mogilski M. Estimating potential harvestable biomass for bioenergy from sustainably managed private native forests in South east Queensland, Australia. Forest Ecosystem. 2018; 5.
Shirima DD, Munishi PKT, Lewis SL, Burgess ND, Marshall AR, Balmford A, Swetnam RD, Zahabu EM. Carbon storage, structure and composition of miombo woodlands in Tanzania’s Eastern Arc mountains. African Jr. of Ecol. 2011; 49: 332- 342.
Mokria MG, Mekuria W, Gebrakirstos A, Betemariam EA, Belay B, Gashaw T, Brauning A, Mixed- species allometric equations and estimation of aboveground biomass and carbon stocks in restoring degraded landscape in northern Ethiopia. Env. Res. Lett. 2018; 13 (2): 024022.
Lu D, Chen Q, Wang G, Liu L, Li G, Moran E. A survey of remote sensing based aboveground biomass estimation methods in forest ecosystems. Int. Jr. of Digital Earth. 2016; 9 (1): 63- 105.
Chave J, Condit R, Aguilae S, Hernandez A, Lao S, Peroz R. Error propagation and scaling for tropical biomass estimates. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2004;359 (1443):409- 420.
Clark DB, Kellner JR. Tropical - forest biomass estimation and the fallacy of misplaced concreteness. Jr. of Veg. Sci. 2012; 23 (6): 1191- 1196.
Gonzalez de Tango J, Lau A., Bartholomeus H., Herold M., Avitabile V., Raumonen P., et al., Estimation of aboveground biomass of large tropical trees with terrestrial LiDAR. Methods in Ecol. and Evolution. 2017: 1- 12.
Calders K., Newnham G., Burt A., Murphy S., Raumonen P., Herold M., Culvenor D., Avitabile V., Disney M., Armston J. et al. Non-destructive estimates of aboveground biomass using terrestrial laser scanning. Methods Ecol. Evolution. 2015; 6 (2): 198- 208.
Gourlet- Fleury S, Rossi V, Rejou Mechain M, Freycon V, Fayolle A, Saint- Andre L, Cornu G, Gerard J et al., Environmental filtering of dense- wooded species controls aboveground biomass stored in African moist forests. Jr. Ecol. 2011;99 (4):981- 990.
Calders, K., Newnham G., Herold M., Murphy S., Culvenor D et al., Estimating aboveground biomass from terrestrial laser scanning in Australian Eucalyptus open Forest. In Proceedings of the Silvi Laser. 2013, Beijing, China; 2013.
Brown S, Gillespie AJR., Lugo AE. Biomass estimation for tropical forests with applications to forest inventory data. Forest Science. 1989;35(4):881- 902.
Zianis D, Muukkonen P., Makipa R., Mencuccini M. Biomass and stem volume equations for tree species in Europe. Silva Fennica, 2005; Monograph no. 4 (4), p 4- 63.
Muukkonen P., Generalized allometric volume and biomass equations for some tree species in Europe. European Jr. of Forest Research. 2007; 126(2): 157- 166.
Chaturvedi RK., Raghubanshi AS, Singh JS. Biomass estimation of dry tropical woody species at juvenile stage. The Scientific World Journal;2012a:1-5.
Chapagain T., Sharma RP, Bhandari SK., Modelling aboveground biomass for three tropical tree species at their juvenile stage. Forest Science and Technology. 2014; 10(2): 51- 60.
Bhandari SK., Neupane HL. Allometric equations for estimating the aboveground biomass of Castanopsis indica at juvenile stage. Banko Jankari. 2014a; 24(1): 14- 22.
Bhandari SK., Neupane HL. Biomass modelling of Alnus nepalensis D. Don. At juvenile stage. International Journal of Interdisciplinary studies. 2014b; 2(1): 47- 60.
Modrzynski J., Chmura DJ., Tjoelker MG. Seedling growth and biomass allocation in relation to leaf habit and shade tolerance among 10 temperate tree species. Tree Physiology. 2015; 35 (8): 879- 893.
Sinha GN., Solanki S., Singh N., Basu A., Shukla AK., Sharma B. An introduction to the Delhi Ridge.2014; Department of Forest and Wildlife. Government of NCT, Delhi.
Champion HG., and Seth SK. A revised survey of the forest types of India. 1968; The Manager of Publications, Delhi- 6.
Tripathi M. Von- Bertalanffy- Richard’s function for modelling Height- Diameter relationship in Albizia lebbeck L. Annals of Plant Sciences. 2021; 10(12):4401- 4411.
Philip MS. Measuring trees and forests. 1994. 2nd edition, CAB International, Wallingford.
Reyes G., Brown S., Lugo AE. Wood densities of tropical tree species. United States Department of Agriculture, Southern Forest Experimental Station, 1992.
Chenge, IB. Height- Diameter relationship of trees in Omo Strict nature forest reserve, Nigeria. Trees Forest and People. 2021, 3.
Harris DC., Nonlinear least- squares curve fitting with Microsoft Solver. Jr. of Chemical Education. 1998; 75(1): 119- 121.
Richard FJ., A flexible growth curve for empirical use. Jr. of Experimental Botany. 1959; 10(29): 290- 300.
Huxley SJ. Problems of relative growth. 1932, 1st edition, The Dial Press, New York, 312.
Bhandari SK., Chhetri BBK., Individual- based modelling for predicting height and biomass of juveniles of Shorea robusta. Australian Jr. of For. Sci. 2020; 137: 133- 160.
Westfall PH. Kurtosis and Peakedness.,.1905- 2014. R.I.P, The American Statistician. 2014; 68(3): 191- 195.
Mahmood H., Siddique MRH., Islam SZ., Abdullah SR., Matieu H., Iqbal MZ., Akhtar M. Applicability of semi- destructive method to derive allometric model for estimating aboveground biomass and carbon stock in the hill zone of Bangladesh. Jr. of Forestry Res. 2019; 1-11. https://doi.org/ doi.org/10.1007/s11676-019-00881-5
Saha C., Hossain M., Nayan SNS, Siddique MRH., Abdullah SR., Islam SZ., Iqbal MZ., Akhtar M. Allometric biomass models for the most abundant fruit tree species of Bangladesh: a non- destructive approach. Environmental Challenges; 2021. Available:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2021.100047
Zeng WS., Integrated individual tree biomass simultaneous equations for two larch species in northeastern and northern China. Scand. Jr. For. Res.2015; 30: 594- 604.
Zeng W, Zhang L, Chen X, Cheng Z, Ma K, Li Z. Construction of compatible and additive individual- tree biomass models for Pinus tabulaeformis in China. Can. Jr. of For. Res. 2017;47: 467- 475.
Chave J., Rejou- Mechain M., Burkuez A., Chidumayo E., Colgan MS., Delitti WBC et al., Improved allometric models to estimate the aboveground biomass of tropical trees. Global Change Biol. 2014; 20 (10): 3177- 3190.
Dutca, I., Mather R., Blujdea VNB, Ioras F., Olari M., Abrudan IV., Site- effects on biomass allometric models for early growth plantations of Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.). Biomass and Bioenergy. 2018a;116: 8- 17. Available:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2018.05.013
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2014. Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, New York, p- 1435.
Zianis D., Radoglou K., Comparison between empirical and theoretical biomass allometric models and statistical implications for stem volume prediction. Forestry. 2006; 79: 477 – 487. Available:https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpl028
McRoberts RE., Moser P., Zimermann Oliveria L., Vibrans AC., A general method for assessing the effects of uncertainty in individual- tree volume model prediction on large- area volume estimate with a subtropical forest illustration. Canadian Jr. of Forest Res. 2015; 45(1): 44 – 51.
Gschwantner T., Schadauer K., Vidal C., Lanz A., Tomppo E., et al., Common tree definitions for national forest inventories in Europe. Silva Fennica 2009; 43(2): 303 – 321.
Zianis D, Muukkonen P, Makipaa R, Mencuccini M, Biomass and stem volume equations for tree species in Europe Finnish Society of Forest Science. Finnish Forest Research Institute, Tampere. 2005;63.
Feldpausch TR, Banin L, Phillips OL, Barker TR, Lewis SL, Quesada CA, et al., Height – Diameter allometry of tropical forest trees. Biogeosciences 2011;8:1081-1106.
Hulshof CM, Swenson NG, Weiser MD, Catherina Hulshof CM., Tree height- diameter allometry across the United States. Ecology and Evolution. 2015;5(6):1 – 12.
Dutca I, Mather R, Ioras F. Tree biomass allometry during the early growth of Norway spruce (Picea abies) varies between pure stands and mixtures with European beech (Fagus sylvatica). Can. Jr. For. Res. 2018b;48:77- 84.
Fayolle A, Doucet JL, Gillet JF, Bourland N, Lejeune P., Tree allometry in Central Africa: Testing the validity of pantropical multi species allometric equations for estimating biomass and carbon stocks. For. Ecol. And Management 2013;305:29-37. Available:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2013.05.036
Rutishauser E, Nooran RF, Laumanier Y, Halperin J, et al., Generic allometric models including height best estimate forest biomass and carbon stocks in Indonesia. For. Ecol. and Management 2013; 307: 219- 225. Available:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2013.07.013
Dormann CF, Elith J, Bacher S, Buchmann C, Carl G, et al., Collinearity: A review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance. Eco graph. 2013;36(1): 27- 46. Available:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07348.x
Picard N, Rutishauser E, Ploton P, Ngomanda A. Henery M. Should tree biomass allometry be restricted to power models? For. Ecol. and Management. 2015; 353: 156- 163.
National Forest Policy, Ministry of Environment and Forest, Government of India, New Delhi; 1927.
National Forest Policy, Ministry of Environment and Forest, Government of India, New Delhi; 1988.