Livelihood Improvement of Farmers through Agroforestry Practices in Teesta and Jamuna River Basins

Main Article Content

Rebeka Sultana
Md. Shafiqul Bari

Abstract

Agroforestry is one of the most sustainable land management systems practiced around the world due to the socioeconomic benefits to farmers. In Bangladesh, farmers practice agroforestry, applying indigenous knowledge. The objectives of the study are to explore the dominant agroforestry systems and species preferred by and to assess the socio-economic impact of agroforestry technologies on their livelihoods of farmers of the Char dwellers in Jamuna and Teesta river basins. The study was conducted at four Char Upazillas such as Kazipur, Shariakandi, Kaunia and Dimla. A total 120 farmers were surveyed during the research period using structured questionnaire with both open and closed ended questions. The majority of the respondents (56.67%) having low score in adoption of traditional agroforestry practices. Most of the farmers (94.17%) in Teesta and Jamuna river basins are practicing traditional homestead agroforestry system. The most frequent strategy was boundary tree plantation (44.17%) followed by scattered tree plantation technique on composite planting system, and the alley of cropland. A total of 41 tree species are abundant in Char areas of Teesta and Januna basins. Eucalyptus (Eucalyptus camaldulensis) is widely adaptable in Bangladesh including Char areas followed by Mango (Mangifera indica) in homestead besides, Mahagony (Swietenia mahagoni) is another abundant species planted in croplands boundaries of Char areas along with Akashmoni (Acacia auriculiformis). The farmers mentioned different problems they were facing in practicing agroforestry but ‘shade cast by trees’ was the major problem. Majority farmers of Char areas plant trees in homestead for fruits (63.33%) and in cropland for fuel wood (95.83%) and timber production (82.50%). Farmers’ livelihoods improved enormously by practicing agroforestry as they have more access to food, fodder and fuel wood which is reflected by greater access to livelihood capitals except social capital. However, the farmers have experienced increased incidences of pests and diseases to annual crops and trees. Agroforestry practices increases species diversity, ensure economic return and sustain farmers’ livelihoods. The respondents, local leaders and experts suggested the constrains of adopting agroforestry in Char areas are lack of awareness, education, technical skills, capital, technical assistance, interest, marketing and transportation facilities at the study areas . The government should initiate some agroforestry focused projects, especially in the Char areas for the capacity building of the farmers and equip them with the new farming techniques through trainings and orientation workshops. The farmers should be provided scientific guidance about suitable tree species grown on agricultural land with field crops, their silvicultural operations and tree management practices along with free services and inputs including seeds, seedlings and loan schemes for promoting agroforestry.

Keywords:
Agroforestry, livelihood and river basins.

Article Details

How to Cite
Sultana, R., & Bari, M. S. (2021). Livelihood Improvement of Farmers through Agroforestry Practices in Teesta and Jamuna River Basins. Asian Journal of Research in Agriculture and Forestry, 7(1), 10-27. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajraf/2021/v7i130119
Section
Original Research Article

References

Nair PKR. Agroforestry Systems in the Tropics. Kluwer Academic publisher, Dordrecht. The Netherlands. 1989;491.

Nair PKR. An introduction to Agroforestry. Kluwer Academic publisher. International Centre for Research in Agroforestry (ICRAGROFORESTRY). Dordrecht/boston/London. 1993;499.

Lulandala LLL. Tropical production systems: Agroforestry concepts, systems, practices, potentials, constraints, Research and Training needs. MSc. Forestry Lecture Notes, Sokoine University of Agriculture. Morogoro. 2009;21p.

Kiriba D. Agroforestry an alternative to land management problems in Tanzania. Young environmentalist Trainees; 2011. Available:http://www.makingit happentz.blogspot.com/2011/09/Agroforestry-alternative-to-land site visited on 20/5/2012

Abderkadir A, Bishaw B. Agroforestry and community Forestry for Rehabilitation of Degraded watersheds on the Ethoipia Highlands. In: Proceeding of International Symposium on Contemporary Development Issues. 11-12 July 2003, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. 2003;1-22.

Trongkongsin K. Land Use and Agroforestry in Thailand with special Reference to the Southern Region. Faculty of Agricultural Technology, King Mongkuts Institute of Technology Ladkrabang. Kasetsari Journal Social Science. 1987; 8:189-202.

Oduol PA, Nyadzi G, Swai R, Schueller M, Gama B, Matata SM, Mwageni W, Mbaruku D. Adoption and impact of Agroforestry Technologies on Rural Livelihoods in Southern Agroforestryrica; 2006. Available:http://www.worldagroforestry.org/downloads/publications/PDF/ pp0681.Doc site visited on 15/5/2011.

Chowdhury MK. (1997). Agroforestry in homesteads and croplands: existing practices and potentials. In: Alam MK, Ahmed FU, Amin SMR (eds) Agroforestry: Bangladesh perspectives. Bangladesh Agricultural Research Council, Dhaka. 1997;68–84.

Miah MG, Ahmed FU, Ahmed MM, Alam MN, Choudhury NH, Hamid MA. Agroforestry in Bangladesh: Potentials and opportunities, Paper presented in South Asia Regional Agroforestry Consultation workshop held on 23–25 November, 2002 at New Delhi, India; 2002.

Hanif MA, Bari MS, Al Mamun MA, Roy P, Roy RM. Potentiality of organic rice production fertilized with different agroforestry tree leagroforestry litter in Northern Bangladesh. Int J Plant Soil Sci. 2015a;8:1–6. Available:https://doi.org/10.9734/IJPSS /2015/19277

Sharmin A, Rabbi SA. Assessment of farmers’ perception of agroforestry practices in Jhenaidah District of Bangladesh. J Agric Ecol Res Int. 2016; 6:1–10.

Chakraborty M, Haider MZ, Rahaman MM. Socio-economic impact of cropland agroforestry: evidence from Jessore District of Bangladesh. Int J Res Agric For. 2015;22:11–20.

Rahman SA, Imam MH, Snelder DJ, Sunderland T. Agroforestry for livelihood security in Agrarian landscapes of the Padma floodplain in Bangladesh. Small Scale For. 2012;11:529–538. Available:https://doi.org/10.1007/s1184 2-012-9198-y

Garrity DP. Agroforestry and the achievement to the millennium development goals. Agrofor Syst. 2004; 61:5–17.

Rahman MA, Tani M, Asahiro K, Ullah SA. Species composition, diversity and productivity of homesteads in southeastern Bangladesh. Small Scale for. 2017; 16(3):295–309. Available:https ://doi.org/10.1007/ s1184 2-016-9356-8

Leakey RR, Simons AJ. The domestication and commercialization of indigenous trees in agroforestry for the alleviation of poverty. Agrofor Syst. 1998;38:165–176.

Hanif MA, Bari MS, Rahman A. Potentiality of carbon sequestration by agroforestry species in Bangladesh. Res Crops. 2015b;16:562–567. Available:https://doi.org/10.5958/2348-7542.2015.00080 .7

Nair P, Kumar KR, Nair VD. Agroforestry as a strategy for carbon sequestration. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci. 2009;172:10–23.

World Bank. Annual report of World Bank. Washington D.C., USA; 2016.

Hasan MN, Hossain MS, Bari MA, Islam MR. Agricultural land availability in Bangladesh. Soil Resources Development Institute, Dhaka. 2013;17.

Hanif MA, Bari MS. Potentiality of potato based agrisilvicultural land use system in the northern part of Bangladesh. Sci Secure J Biotechnol. 2013;2:61–65.

Yasmin R, Wadud MA, Mandol MMA, Sharif MO. Tree diversity in the homestead and cropland areas of MadhupurUpazilla under Tangail District. J Agrofor Environ. 2010;4:89–92.

Hasanuzzaman M, Hossain M. Leaf litter decomposition and nutrient dynamics associated with common cropland agroforest timber tree species of Bangladesh. Int J For Res. 2015;61:125–139. Available:https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/80594 0

Ibrahim K, Wadud MA, Mondol MA, Alam Z, Rahman GMM. Impact of agroforestry practices on livelihood improvement of the farmers of Char Kalibari area of Mymensingh. J Agrofor Environ. 2011;5:77–80.

Zaman S, Siddique SS, Katoh M. Structure and diversity of homegarden agroforestry in Thakurgaon District, Bangladesh. Open For Sci. 2010;J 3:38–44.

Alam M, Sarker SK. Homestead agroforestry in Bangladesh: dynamics of stand structure and biodiversity. J Sustain For. 2011;30(6):584–599. Available:https://doi.org/10.1080/10549 811.2011.57160 6

Roy B, Rahman MH, Fardusi MJ. Status, diversity, and traditional uses of homestead gardens in northern Bangladesh: a means of sustainable biodiversity conservation. ISRNBiodivers; 2013. Available:https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/12410 3

Rahman GMM, Alam MJ. Composition and benefit of cropland agroforestry practices practiced in Rajshahi district. J Agrofor Environ. 2007;1:149–153

Rashid MH, Islam KK, Mondol MA, Pervin MJ. Impact of traditional homestead agroforestry on the livelihood of the farmers in northern Bangladesh. J Agrofor Environ. 2007;2(1):11–14.

Rahman SA, Baldauf C, Mollee EM, Abdullah-Al-Pavel M, Toy MM, Sunderland T. Cultivated plants in the diversified homegardens of local communities in Ganges Valley, Bangladesh. Sci J Agric Res Manag; 2013b. Available:https://doi.org/10.7237/sjarm /197

Hasanuzzaman M, Hossain M, Saroar M. Diversity and preference of agricultural crops in the cropland agroforests of southwestern Bangladesh. Int J Agric Crop Sci. 2014b;7:364.

Hanif MA, Roy RM, Bari MS, Ray PC, Rahman MS, Hasan MF. Livelihood Improvements Through Agroforestry: Evidence from Northern Bangladesh Small-scale Forestry. 2018;17(4):505-522 ref.41. Available:http://rd.springer.com/journal/11842

EGIS. Environmental and Geographic Information Services, Dhaka, Bangladesh; 2000.

Schmuck-Widmann H. Facing the Jamuna River, Indigenous and Engineering Knowledge in Bangladesh, Bangladesh Resource Centre for Indigenous Knowledge; 2001.

Rahman SA, Paras FD, Khan SR, Imtiaj A, Farhana KM, Toy MM, Akhand MB, Sunderland T. Initiatives of tropical agroforestry to sustainable agriculture: A case study of Capasia village, Northern Bangladesh. J Hortic For. 2013a;3:115–121.

Saifullah NM. Char dwellers’ adaptation to climate change. MS thesis, BRAC University, Dhaka, Bangladesh; 2010.

Ibrahim MK. Impact of agroforestry practices on livelihood improvement of the farmers of Char Kalibari area of Mymensingh. MS thesis, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh; 2011.

Nath TK, Inoue M, Pradhan FE, Kabir MA. Indigenous practices and socio-economics of Areca catechu L. and Piper betel L. based innovative agroforestry in northern rural Bangladesh. For Trees Livelihoods. 2011;20:175–190. Available:https ://doi.org/10.1080/14728 028.2011.97567 05

Babulo B, Muys, Nega F, Tollens E, Nyssen J, Deckers J, Mathijs E. Household livelihood strategies and forest dependence in the highlands of Tigray, Northern Ethiopia. Agricultural Systems. 2018;98:147-155.

Garrity DP. Science-based agroforestry and the millenium development goals. In: Garrity DP, Okono A, Grayson M, Parrott S (Eds). World Agroforestry into the future. Nairobi, Kenya: World Agroforestry Centre, ICRAGROFORESTRY; 2006.

World Bank. Sustaining forests: a development strategy. Washington, DC: The World Bank; 2004.

Jama B, Zeila A. Agroforestry in the drylands of Eastern Agroforestryrica: a call to action. ICRAGROFORESTRY Working Paper – No. 1. Nairobi: World Agroforestry Centre; 2005.

Alavalapati JRR, Mercer D. (Eds). Valuing agroforestry systems: methods and applications. Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers. The Netherlands; 2004.

Alavalapati JRR, Nair P. Socioeconomics and institutional perspectives of agroforestry. In: Palo, M. and Uusivuori, J. (Eds.) World forests, society and environment: markets and polices. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2001.

Brown D, Stephens E, Ouma J, Murithi F, Barrett C. Livelihood strategies in the rural Kenyan highlands. Agroforestryrican Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics. 2006;1(1):21-36.

DFID. Sustainable livelihoods guidance sheets. DFID, London, UK; 2001.

DFID. Sustainable rural livelihood. Department for International Development, 94 Victoria Street, London; 2000.

BBS. Year book of agricultural statistics-2016. Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics. Ministry of Planning, Dhaka; 2016.

Mamun AA, Saifullah M, Hossain A, Hossain K, Kabir A. Eucalyptus agroforestry system in Chittagong: socio-economic potentiality amid controversies. Int J Agron Agric Res. 2014;4(1):32–39.

Endale Y, Derero A, Argaw M, Muthuri C. Farmland tree species diversity and spatial distribution pattern in semi-arid East Shewa, Ethiopia. For Trees Livelihoods; 2016. Available:https//doi.org/10.1080/14728 028.2016.12669 71

Guyassa E, Raj AJ. Assessment of biodiversity in cropland agroforestry and its role in livelihood development in dryland areas: A case study from Tigray region, Ethiopia. J Agric Technol. 2013;9:829–844.

Tiwari P, Kumar R, Thakur L, Salve A. Agroforestry for sustainable rural livelihood: A review. Int J Pure Appl Biosci. 2017;5:299–309.

Rajendren K, Mohan E. Tree species with potential of nitrogen fixation in agroforestry system adopted by farmers in semi-arid region of Southern India. Biol Res Bull. 2014;3:1–4.

Pattanayak SK, Mercer DE, Erin S, Jui-Chen Y. Taking stock of agroforestry adoption studies. Agroforest. Syst. 2003; 57(3):173–186.

Montambault JR, Alavalapati JRR. Socioeconomic research in agro-forestry: A decade in review, Agroforest. Syst. 2005;65(2):151–161.